Decision Infrastructure

Decision Infrastructure for AI Systems

Architectures change. Decisions still fail the same way.

SignalSmith focuses on the governance of why a system acts, whether it should act, and who is accountable when consequences land.

Decision infrastructure keeps intent, execution, and accountability connected across MCP, A2A, RAG, workflows, and copilots.

Decision layers

Three decision layers hold regardless of choreography.

  • Forge: intent formation
  • SignalFrame: governed execution
  • Atlas: post-decision accountability

Same decision layers, different choreography

Architectures collapse into the same decision layers, even when the choreography looks different.

Diagram showing Forge, SignalFrame, and Atlas layered across multiple AI architectures with the same decision layers.
Architectures collapse into Forge, SignalFrame, and Atlas.
  • Forge — intent formation before commitments.
  • SignalFrame — governed execution with authority checks.
  • Atlas — post-decision accountability and consequence.

Centralized access vs decentralized agency

MCP centralizes access through a unified control plane. A2A decentralizes agency across many agents. Decision infrastructure makes both architectures accountable to the same intent, execution, and accountability layers.

Comparison diagram showing MCP single control plane versus A2A multi-agent architecture governed by Forge, SignalFrame, and Atlas layers.
MCP standardizes access while A2A decentralizes agency.

Research that stress-tests decisions

Our research POV pressure-tests the same decision layers across architectures, proving how intent, execution, and accountability hold up under real-world demand.